Tag Archives: Paris

London, etc. and Paris, 20: Final Thoughts

Unlike many of my contemporaries, I was unable to travel much outside of the North American continent until I was in my 50s. Over the years, however, my reading and other interests (art, film, theatre, culinary) have taken my imagination far and wide, and made me long to see more places in the world than I will ever actually get to visit. About forty years ago, I made a list of places I wanted to see. I am enough of a paper hoarder that I could probably find that list again if I put my mind to it, but it would undoubtedly depress me: after all, I’m suddenly three-quarters-of-a century old and my travelling days are likely coming to an end. (Not yet! But soon.)

My interest in travelling both literally and figuratively has also meant that throughout my life, I have usually been studying one language or another, never attaining fluency but always enjoying the exercise. I studied Russian, French and Spanish at university, and have since taken several courses in the latter two languages with the intent of brushing up. I’ve used Duolingo to give me some knowledge of Italian, and I am currently working on German. My literary interests have always been international in scope as well, and books set in countries from Burma/Myanmar through China and Russia, to Japan and Iceland, across Europe, down through Africa, and over to Brazil and Patagonia and Chile, have piqued my interest in actually seeing the places where they are set. At the age of fifty, I finally got to the UK, home of my forebears, where I visited London and saw a tiny bit of Wales.

When it finally became possible for me to make a major excursion to a foreign land, India was at the top of my list – much to the dismay of my elder son, who had generously shared his air travel points with me as a 60th birthday gift. He was not keen on the idea of his mother travelling alone to India, much less on feeling any sense of responsibility if anything happened to her. But I felt that if I had only one chance to see an entirely different geography and culture from my own, I wanted it to be as entirely different as possible. Plus, I didn’t travel alone: I joined a group trip. (The eldest of my travelling companions was barely half my age, but after they all got used to having someone older than most of their parents in the group, it was fine. It was even better once they basically forgot that I was in their midst.) I loved India, and confirmed that I loved travelling.

Most of my travels since have been with my husband, Arnie, especially since his retirement ten years or so ago. Together, in addition to several U.S. trips, we have been to Cuba, Italy (& Croatia), Germany (& Prague), and this past year to London (etc.) and Paris.

I have gained more than I can ever explain from these travels, most of it positive. Travelling has changed me for the better, enriched my life, widened my perspectives, deepened my feelings of connection with people around the world, and made me appreciate our differences. Perhaps the most frustrating lesson to learn has been that it would not be possible for me to cross travel destinations off my life list, even if I knew where it was. There is not one place of those I have travelled to (at least so far) that I would not relish going back to again for an extended stay. In fact, in most cases the hankering is worse now that I’ve seen the places than it was before I went. When I watch a TV series or a movie set in Berlin, or London, or Mumbai, or Mexico City, or read a book from or about somewhere I have been, I long to be back there again.

Our most recent trip was no exception. If you asked me right now if I would rather visit a country I haven’t ever seen before or go back to Paris (and maybe see some more of France), I would be hard pressed to answer the question. I did love Paris.

But then I think of the night markets in Japan, or the Sagrada Familia, and my imagination is off and running once again.

My only hope at this point is that in my 90s, when I can no longer travel, I will at least be able to afford some kind of virtual-reality headset so I can visit a few places my actual body has not yet been to. (I hope the device comes with smells. Food would be nice, too.)

Paris may feel like it’s half way around the world, but on May the 11th we woke up in a hotel room in Paris and went to sleep around midnight the same day in our own bed in Toronto. That boggles my mind, even though I know that this experience was only possible because of time differences, and that these differences also mean that it would take us two days to get back to that hotel again.

The speed of our return was also of course due to a few miracles of modern travel. On May 1, when we took a bus from London to Paris, which included crossing the English Channel on a ferry, the trip took ten hours. On the 11th, we returned by train through the “Chunnel,” and the trip from the Gare du Nord in Paris to St. Pancras Station in London was only two hours and twenty minutes. (It would have taken about the same length of time to fly, and the cost would have been almost the same.)

At St. Pancras we transferred to the Tube, which delivered us to Heathrow Airport in about 45 minutes, and our plane for Toronto left not long after we arrived at the airport. Smooth sailing, as it were.

While the train trip back to London saved us time, I would not have wanted to miss the worst day of our entire trip, which had happened on the day we travelled the opposite way by bus.

It is my hope and expectation that the current fad of people posting almost nothing but photos of themselves online will come to an end shortly. However, the fact that many selfie addicts (younger women in particular) have found a way to monetize the practice is not conducive to the likelihood of an early end to this trend.

As I have previously written in a blog post on the matter, influencers are an increasing eyesore (ironically) at tourist spots around the world. “Influencers” (at least in this context) are people who get all dressed up in clothing, makeup and accessories from name-brand fashion and cosmetics outlets, and then go and stand in front of something that makes an interesting backdrop and get their photos taken, and then they post the photos on their Instagram or other social media platforms, and hope that the clothing, accessory or cosmetics outlet will pay them for promoting their products. People who are famous from other initiatives – e.g. the tackily clad women from Selling Sunset – are ready-made influencers: they just add sponsored products to the photo shoots they are already doing in order to promote their programs and themselves. I expect that they are paid for the number of “hits” that their images receive online, and that the more popular the influencer, the more they can charge.

I would also guess that a lot of the (literal) poseurs we saw on our travels were wannabe, rather than established, influencers: not all of them can have financially viable web presences. I wonder whether these people have to pay for their own clothes. No doubt the reason so many of them show up at places like the Eiffel Tower or Niagara Falls is because these landmarks are also popular Google search destinations, which increases the odds that people will come across their photos.

Several times on this trip, like the ones that preceded it, we walked farther than we’d intended. One day early in our visit to London we tracked more than 18,000 steps (including eleven flights of stairs). By the time we got off the underground at the station near our hotel that night, I was promising my feet that if they’d just carry me the final few blocks, I’d never make them go anywhere again. My back was not happy either. But each time when I thought I’d really overdone it, I was relieved to discover that a night’s sleep was all I needed to recharge, after which I was able to head out one more time. (Arnie, by contrast, just kept going and going, without complaint. Very impressive.)

The lesson I learned from this is that you should visit all the interesting foreign places you can when your limbs are still limber and walking is easy. However, if you can’t go until you have achieved the age of aches, pains and sore feet, you should go anyway. You’ll be surprised how far you can get when there’s something around the next corner or at the next Tube stop that you just have to check out. (Of course, good shoes are essential. I say this at the risk of sounding as old as I am.)

A backup power supply for your phone is also essential. There is nothing worse than running out of battery power before you’re ready to call it a day, especially if you need GPS to get you the final few blocks back to your hotel.

Here is a photo Arnie took of the inside of the Shakespeare and Company bookshop. I didn’t realize he had taken this when I wrote my post about the shop. This really captures the feel of the place.

Arnie also got a great video of a charming busker who provided a musical accompaniment for part of our trip from Paris to Versailles.

And that FINALLY concludes my blog series about London, etc. and Paris. I am most grateful to those who have been reading, and for the many positive comments!

A Page from My “Trip Planner”

London, etc. and Paris, 19: Finishing strong – Cimetière Père Lachaise, and Montmartre

We spent most of the last day of our travels in a cemetery: but what a cemetery it was! The list of famous people who are buried at Cimetière Père Lachaise in the 20th Arrondissement seems endless, and the temptation to go visit “just one more,” and then “just one more” again, is overwhelming. There are authors, musicians, scientists, philosophers and more. Notable figures about whom most of us have heard for our entire lives turn out to have been real people who came to their inevitable ends one way or another and were laid to rest in Paris.

We walked until we could walk no more and barely scratched the surface (as it were), but even then we only left because as closing time approached, an official came along with a very large and very loud handbell, which she rang as she started herding everyone toward the exit gates. Begging for sympathy because you just had to visit one more grave was pointless. The bell ringers (probably necessarily) have hearts as stony as the monuments. (It’s not just me. See this post, “TERRIBLE STAFF – beware of the bell ringer,” on TripAdvisor.)

We spent about five hours wandering about this beautiful 44-hectare (110-acre) property, as do nearly 3.5 million other visitors every year. I am very grateful to my friend Jacqui Dumas who urged us to visit this place, and gave us other excellent tips that helped make the entire trip to Paris very special.

The cemetery is named after the long-time confessor of Louis XIV, Père Français de La Chaise, who had lived on this property for many years. It was was established in 1804 by Napoleon, who “had declared during the Consulate that ‘Every citizen has the right to be buried regardless of race or religion'” (Wikipedia).

As you will notice from the photos, Père Lachaise is a “garden cemetery” and the grounds are stunning and wonderfully maintained. It would be a superb place to wander or to sit and read a book even if one weren’t surrounded by reminders of some of the most interesting and notable people in history.

As well as graves of the famous and not so famous, the huge property includes a crematorium and a columbarium, as well as French war graves, memorials from both world wars, and an ossuary containing the bones of 2500 French soldiers who were killed in the siege of Paris during the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871).

Probably the most visited grave is that of Jim Morrison, lead singer of The Doors, who died of a drug overdose in Paris in 1971 and allegedly wanted to be buried at Père Lachaise in order to be near one of his literary heroes, Oscar Wilde. Morrison’s original grave in the cemetery was disturbed and vandalized by Morrison “fans” so often, as were other graves nearby (collateral damage), that Parisiens were outraged. In 1990, the gravesite was dismantled – even the headstone had to be demolished – and a new one with barriers around it took its place.

Morrison fans visiting the grave often stick chewing gum to a tree, now wrapped in bamboo, near the grave. I was unable to discover the reason for this tradition.

After we had worn out our legs and feet at the Cimetière Père Lachaise, we realized that we’d better check out Montmartre, the 130m-high hill in north-central Paris, because we were leaving Paris the next day and wouldn’t have another chance. We did not intend to walk to the top, but when we got there… well, you know how it is with mountains. It was there, so up we went.

We toured the beautiful Sacre Couer Basilica which stands on the top of the hill, and then went out to look at the view of the city before making our way back down. We had to pick our way very carefully among people who were seated everywhere on the steps and the grass, enjoying the evening, chatting with one another and enjoying performances by buskers.

When we reached the bottom of the hill again, we discovered that, just a few feet away from where we had begun our climb, there was a funicular that we could have taken to the top, avoiding all those stairs.

Video of the View

By the time we had dinner and finally got back to our hotel, we had walked 16,500 steps or 11.62 km We were certainly ready to put our feet up, but it had been a perfect day and a perfect way to end our trip to Paris.

Walking back down from Montmartre towards our hotel

London, etc. and Paris 18: Opera, Opera, Opera!

On our second-last full day in Paris, we turned our focus to two of the most important sites for opera in the city – opera having become one of my favourite pastimes in the past few decades. First we toured the lavishly beautiful Palais Garnier, then later in the day we made our way to the more restrained but no less magnificent Opera Bastille. There we attended an extraordinary production of Salomé by Richard Strauss, starring Norway’s Lise Davidsen, one of the most in-demand sopranos in the world.

[Reminder: If you receive this post as an email, you might want to click on the “Read on Blog or Reader” link at the top of the page so you can see larger versions of the photos. Once you get to the webpage, click on a photo and it will expand.]

The magnificently designed and lavishly decorated Palais Garnier was built at the direction of Napoleon III. Construction began in 1861 and took more than a decade to complete. Named after Charles Garnier, its architect, the theatre was built in what is known as the Napoleonic III or Second Empire style. And as the “influencers” posing everywhere in the Palais when we were there had clearly discovered, there are more varied photo backdrops for lovely young women outside the performance auditorium than there is inside it. In fact, much of the facility was intended to be decorative rather than functional.

“The basic principle of Napoleon III interior decoration was [to] leave no space undecorated. Another principle was polychromy, an abundance of color obtained by using colored marble, malachite, onyx, porphyry, mosaics, and silver or gold plated bronze. Wood panelling was often encrusted with rare and exotic woods, or darkened to resemble ebony. [….] Drawing liberally from the Gothic style, Renaissance style, and the styles dominant during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI [including Baroque], the combination was derided by Émile Zola as ‘the opulent bastard child of all the styles'” (Wikipedia).

“Opulent” is right.

“The ceiling of the Opéra Garnier was completely renovated and re-imagined in 1964 at the urging of Minister of Culture André Malraux. The talented Marc Chagall was entrusted with painting 2,400 square feet of frescoes. The opera’s new ceiling was widely decried and contested when it was unveiled to the public on September 23, 1964, and the work at this iconic Paris opera house continues to elicit curiosity and stir passions.” (The Ceiling of the Opera Garnier)

The Palais Garnier, which seats nearly 2,000 people, was for many years the sole home of the Paris Opera, which has itself has been around in one form or another since it was established by King Louis XIV in about 1670. The impetus for establishing the company was a desire to catch up to or even surpass the Italians in the field – although the Italians, having invented opera during the Renaissance, did have a good head start. Still, today French opera is well established, and works by composers such as Bizet, Massenet, Gounod and many other traditional and more modern French composers are enjoyed by audiences around the world.

The Paris Ballet is also part of the Paris Opera organization. Although most of productions by the Paris opera and ballet companies are now staged at the “new” Opera Bastille, nearly 400 performances still attract sold-out audiences to the stage of the Palace Garnier every year. Tickets for the opportunity to tour the building (without seeing the current stage production) also regularly sell out, which is why we didn’t get into the facility until our third attempt.

Before we left Canada, we happened to see a very interesting documentary on TVO called Building Bastille (available to watch for free on YouTube). This fascinating program documents how an almost unknown Canadian architect named Carlos Ott won the competition to create a modern opera house where the infamous Bastille Prison had once stood.

The Bastille Opera was an initiative of the then-president of France, François Mitterand. Construction began in 1984, and Mitterand wanted the project completed in time to mark the 200th anniversary of the storming of the Bastille, which had occurred early in the French Revolution in 1789. No expense was to be spared – he wanted the building to be both culturally and architecturally cutting-edge. Jacques Chirac, who had been mayor of Paris and was elected president of France in 1986, tried to halt the project several times due his to concerns about rising costs, and part of Ott’s challenge was to keep the construction moving until it was completed. With Mitterand’s help, he succeeded, and secured his name as a world-class architect with this amazing facility.

“[The Opera Bastille] was a conscious, egalitarian, departure from the Palais Garnier, which has several dozen types of seats and does not offer stage visibility from all of them. Every seat at the Opéra Bastille offers an unrestricted view of the stage, is the very same type of seat with the same level of comfort, and there are no boxes. Subtitles are visible from every seat except for those at the very back of the arena and of the first balcony” (Wikipedia).

The Bastille Opera house was just one piece of a massive monument-building initiative undertaken by Mitterand in the 1980s. Entitled the Grands Projets, the undertaking was intended to revitalize the architecture of the city and to reflect France’s commitment to, and achievements in, the arts. In addition to the Opera Bastille, the Grand Projets included the Musée d’Orsay, the pyramid at the Louvre, la Grand Arche de Défense and several other major buildings. When all of it was complete – many years after originally scheduled – the cost of these projects was estimated to have reached 15.7 billion francs.

The facility seats 2,703 people. In addition to the main theatre, it includes a concert hall and a studio theatre.

“The backstage [of the Opera Bastille] occupies an enormous area (5,000 m2), six times larger than the stage […]. A system of rails and a rotating dock make it possible to roll entire sets on and off on giant motorised platforms in a few minutes and to store these platforms on the available backstage spots; quick changes of set enable the artists to rehearse a work in the afternoon and to perform another one in the evening within the same space, something impossible at the Palais Garnier. The use of such platforms also makes it considerably easier to use three-dimensional sets rather than traditional flat images. Under the stage is a giant elevator, which is used to lower unused set platforms to an underground storehouse as large as the backstage itself” (Wikipedia).

Another elevator system lifts and lowers the entire orchestra pit, as required by different productions.

Here is a video showing the interior of the Opera Bastille’s main theatre.

Critics have called the Bastille “cold” and “impersonal” due to its minimalist design and the extensive use of concrete walls, and black, cream and grey decore. To my mind, the spareness also works to its advantage, as it surely offers less distraction from actual productions than would the ornately and colourful Opera Garnier.

Ott’s building certainly seemed a perfect setting for the production of Salomé we saw on May 9. Lise Davidsen was outstanding as the stepdaughter and niece of King Herod, a man who has lustful eyes for her. She falls in love with prophet Jochanaan (John the Baptist), whom Herod has imprisoned mainly because he’s afraid of the power he wields with his spirituality. Jochanaan resists Salome’s overtures, and ultimately she gives Herod everything he wants from her (as depicted in the agonizing and powerful Dance of the Seven Veils) in exchange for Jochanaan’s head.

The opera was dramatic, haunting, and fantastic.

After the opera, we emerged into a warm, perfect Paris evening.

.

London, etc. and Paris, 17: Versailles!

Travel Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2024

In the past few days I have written at some length about how I have wished that I had learned more about the history of France in general and the French Revolution in particular before I went to France, rather than after I returned to Canada, so that I’d have had a greater appreciation for the historical significance of several of the sites we visited. Among these were the Champs de Mars, a large green space southeast of the Eiffel Tower, where Bastille Day was first celebrated on July 14 1790 to mark the first anniversary of the storming of the Bastille and where the first major massacre of the Revolution occurred, and Place de la Concorde, which was the location of many of the 17,000 public beheadings that took place during the Reign of Terror.

The Palace at Versailles also played a central role in the French Revolution. The primary impetus for the Revolution, which ultimately lasted for more than ten years and expanded from a civil uprising to involve several neighbouring countries, was the terrible social and economic circumstances in which most French people were living, largely due to the onerous tax burden that the “ancien regime” (“old order”) imposed on them. The economy was on the verge of collapse but in the meantime, King Louis XVI (a popular king) and his wife Marie-Antoinette (not as despicable as her reputation would have it, from what I have now read) were living with their son the Dauphin and other relatives in the most luxurious conditions imaginable. One early, unsuccessful attempt to quell the fomenting unrest took place at the Royal Tennis Court at Versailles in 1789, and it was from Versailles that the king and queen were moved to the Tuileries Castle in Paris and thence to prison and after that to their own public executions.

I highly recommend Hilary Mantel’s novel A Place of Greater Safety and the French Revolution podcast episodes of The Rest is History for fascinating in-depth explorations of this decade in French history – which did not go well at all but ultimately did lead to a democracy in France that has lasted till this day (and which we desperately hope will continue).

Where I was going with that draft, now revised to become this draft, was to draw comparisons between the social and economic conditions in France that precipitated the overthrow of the monarchy, then the failure of one replacement system of government after another, with conditions that are contributing to the popularity of far-right movements around the world today. But I decided that whole line of thought was too depressing, and also that it would take me weeks to research my argument to the extent that I could support it with citations, so (you’ll be relieved to hear) I’ve decided to just show you some of the many photos we took when we went to Versailles and toured the chateau. ‘ll leave you to crawl down the rabbit holes that lead to political parallels if you so desire.

.

Versailles palace , which is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site, was built originally as a hunting lodge in 1623 by Louis XIII, and expanded to its current massive size by Louis XIV. It was the latter Louis who moved the seat of the French government from Paris to Versailles (no. I will not mention Mar-a Lago here), and it was at Versailles where Louis XVI was living when all hell broke loose.

Today “The palace is owned by the government of France […]. About 15,000,000 people visit the palace, park, or gardens of Versailles every year, making it one of the most popular tourist attractions in the world” (Wikipedia). The Versailles experience begins as soon as you board the train that carries visitors along the 10.7 k route from Paris.

We saw sculptures in nearly every room of the palace, some strangely attractive and some really breathtaking. In the former category are the statuary shown in first four images below, which were formerly fountains with water spewing from their mouths and heads. The last two photos are of more classical statues, made from white Carrara marble. They date from the mid-1600s.

We visited the royal family chapel, which was larger and more ornate than many free-standing churches I’ve been in. There were also a lot of interesting paintings in the palace, not only hanging on the walls but also decorating the ceilings.

Versailles today is a museum. Not all of the art we saw would have been there during the reign of Louis XVI; some of the works were created long after he was relieved of his regal responsibilities.

The state rooms of the king and queen, including their private bedchambers, extended through nine or ten large rooms. Here is a sample:

We saw the famous gardens at Versailles through many of the windows in the rooms we visited, but we ran out of time and energy before we could wander around outside

The Treaty of Versailles which ended the first world war was signed in the Hall of Mirrors on June 28, 1919.

.

After returning to Paris, we decided to eat dinner at Bouillon Pigalle restaurant. We had seen the long lines waiting outside this restaurant a few days previously and had become interested in eating there, but it seemed to have no accessible system for taking reservations. We decided that waiting in line must be worth it, since so many other people were doing that. The line is so long that it runs down the whole block and around the corner. Thanks to a special agreement between the restaurants, there is a break in the line in the middle so that patrons of the McDonald’s next door can get to their destination.

The wait was worth it, as it was so often on this trip. Le Bouillon Pigalle serves delicious French food in a very efficient manner, where patrons sit close to one another and orders are taken almost as soon as you’ve been seated. But the system works: there is no sense of being rushed, the food is excellent, and the price is reasonable.

London, etc. and Paris, 15: A River Cruise and a Visit to the Arc de Triomphe, but no sign of Xi Jinping.

We descended the stairs at the end of the Rue de la Manutention (which sounds a little better in French than it does in English, but not much. The English translation of “Manutention” is “Handling”), and made our way to the footbridge across the Seine that would take us to our river tour.

The river cruise in Paris starts just below the Eiffel Tower. I will spare you the ten or twenty photos I added that day to my already ridiculously large collection of Tower photos, but there are many pix of that landmark on my last post, if you have a hankering.

There is a very large island in the Seine east of the Musée D’Orsay called “Île de la Cité.” Just east of that is another, smaller island that fits nicely against the first (just as though it all used to be one big island!) called Île Saint-Louis. The cruise took us around that second island and then headed back toward its home dock.

Here are some of the sights we saw on the trip.

One of the highlights of the cruise was a close-up of Notre-Dame de Paris, which suffered a disastrous fire on April 15, 2019. The meticulous and very expensive reconstruction of the mediaeval Catholic cathedral, and particularly its spire, continues. It is expected to reopen in December of 2024.

There was a large group of high school students on board with us, and they insisted on making a howling noise whenever we went under one of Paris’s many bridges, thereby allowing us the opportunity (as it were) to hear not only them, but also their echoes.

Kids!

After the tour, we took the Métro to the Arc de Triomphe (1806) which is located at the west end of the Champs-Élysées. (Beyond that, the road is called l’Avenue de la Grande Armée.) We had seen the east end of the Avenue des Champs-Élysées earlier in the week, when we visited the Place de la Concorde.

We declined to climb to the roof of the Arc de Triomphe and instead satisfied our curiosity from across the immense traffic circle that surrounds the monument.

“The Arc de Triomphe de l’Étoile, often called simply the Arc de Triomphe [… ] stand[s] […] at the centre of Place Charles de Gaulle, formerly named Place de l’Étoile—the étoile or “star” of the juncture formed by its twelve radiating avenues […]. The Arc de Triomphe honours those who fought and died for France in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, with the names of all French victories and generals inscribed on its inner and outer surfaces. Beneath its vault lies the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier from World War I.” (Thanks as always to Wikipedia, which I support with a donation every month as I’m sure all regular users of that resource do. It’s always wise to double-check references on the site if you are citing the material in Important Documents, and some articles are biassed or incomplete, but in this age of disinformation the checks and balances on Wikipedia make it a very reliable source of background information on just about any topic you can think of. Plus, if you find a mistake, you can fix it yourself.)

I am a fan of the Tour de France, which always ends up circling the Arc de Triomphe during the final stage before heading to the finish line, so I took an extra pleasure in visualizing the peleton zooming around the monument. I would not personally want to cycle over all those cobbled streets, but then there is nothing in the Tour de France that tempts me to participate as anything but a spectator.

Later we walked past the magnificent Église Saint-Pierre de Chaillot, which opened in 1938 on a site the Roman Catholic Church has owned? occupied? since the 11th Century. “The church consists of three parts: a 65-metre high bell tower that dominates the whole and is located on Avenue Marceau, a low church, invisible because it was built like a crypt above which rises the main church with a central bell tower. The building is also characterised by its monumental façade on the avenue. […] It is constructed in the Romano-Byzantine style” (Wikipedia).

We didn’t go inside but the photos on the Wikipedia site suggest that the interior is as magnificent as the exterior.

On our way back to the subway, we found ourselves on a section of roadways near the Pont d’Alma that had been entirely closed off to allow for the safe passage of President Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China, who we knew from the news was dining with President Macron that evening. We probably saw the vehicle that carried him past us, but since a lot of very official vehicles with dark windows went by, we weren’t sure which one it was. In the video and photo below you can see Xi supporters on the east side of the bridge awaiting his arrival. I don’t think they saw him, either. One of the people watching with us (of which there were very few. Most people just went on about their business) said that street closures like this for visiting dignitaries are common in Paris. In other words, as we waited for a glimpse of Xi, our status as tourists was probably obvious to all of the locals – and maybe even to the President of China.

We may not have seen the President, but we were rewarded for our wait with a rainbow.

London, etc. and Paris, 14: A Good Day for a Stroll with Close-ups of The Eiffel Tower and the Moulin Rouge

Paris is best seen on foot, and although we hadn’t exactly planned it, we were able to take advantage of our one Sunday in the city to walk and walk and walk.

Our original intention that day had been to visit the Musée D’Orsay, which offers free admission to everyone on Sundays. However, the Musée was “sold out” of free tickets so we weren’t able to visit. Turns out that even when tickets are free, you still need to book them in advance to secure an entry time – which we had not done because we didn’t know it was necessary. So NB: if you want a free ticket to the Musée D’Orsay, book it in advance online. (I’m sure this tip is applicable to other museums and galleries as well.)

From the museum, we walked down to the Quai D’Orsay. From there, we made our way past several landmarks and bridges along the Left (south) Bank of the Seine to the Eiffel Tower, then crossed a bridge and walked back up the Right Bank. Later we made our way by subway to Place Pigalle, where we checked out the Moulin Rouge and marvelled at the dozens upon dozens of sex shops in the area. While I imagine there are some economic advantages to putting all of these outlets (for which the French term is “sex-shops”) in the same part of the city (reduced costs for advertising, shipping, signage, etc.) due to economy of scale or something, I can only thank the powers-that-be that Paris hasn’t used the same kind of organizational model for its patisseries.

Our stroll down the Left Bank took us (for the second time) past the National Assembly and the Pont Alexandre III, and offered views across the river of Right Bank attractions, including the Grand Palais and some of the buildings that border the Tuilleries Garden.

In the last volume of his novel, Marcel Proust mentions how, one evening during a blackout early in the first World War, soon after the clocks had been turned forward in the Spring, he stood not far from the Pont des Invalides on the Left Bank and looked across the Seine at the Trocadero. As I had hoped to do before I even went to France, I was able to replicate that experience (albeit in the daytime and not during a war). It was a small thing, but it pleased me.

The Trocadero, which we saw only from a distance, is a neighbourhood in the 16th arrondissement on the north (right) bank of the Seine, almost directly across from the Champs de Mars and Tour Eiffel. The Palais du Trocadéro was built on the Chaillot Hill for the World’s Fair in 1867. It was shaped like a huge concert hall, featured an enormous pipe organ (since moved to Lyon but still in use), and was named after a battle won by France in Spain. The building did not prove popular and it was partially demolished and then rebuilt in time for another World’s Fair, in 1937, at which time it was renamed Le Palais de Chaillot. The grounds include gardens, fountains and an underground aquarium, and I have added it to my “to do” list for next time.

“The Hôtel des Invalides, commonly called Les Invalides, is a complex of buildings in the 7th arrondissement of Paris, France, containing museums and monuments, all relating to the military history of France, as well as a hospital and an Old Soldiers’ retirement home, the building’s original purpose” (Wikipedia). On July 17, 1879, Parisian rioters ransacked the Hôtel for guns and ammunition before storming the Bastille.

From Wikipedia: “The Eiffel Tower is a wrought-iron lattice tower on the Champ de Mars in Paris, France. It is named after the engineer Gustave Eiffel, whose company designed and built the tower from 1887 to 1889. Locally nicknamed ‘La dame de fer‘ (French for ‘Iron Lady’), it was constructed as the centerpiece of the 1889 World’s Fair, and to crown the centennial anniversary of the French Revolution. Although initially criticised by some of France’s leading artists and intellectuals for its design, it has since become a global cultural icon of France and one of the most recognisable structures in the world.”

When you actually see the Eiffel Tower in real life, you cannot stop taking photos of it. Or at least, I couldn’t. I have about 200 photos of the Eiffel Tower.

In the middle of a night shortly before we went to France, the famous windmill atop the famous Moulin Rouge fell off. It had not been reattached when we visited, so we had to make do with a Moulin Rouge cassé. Moulin Rouge is one of my favourite movies, so it was a real treat to visit the neighbourhood and the entryway to the facility, windmill or no windmill.

We did not attend any shows inside the Moulin Rouge but I got a few photos of what visitors might have expected to spend, and to see.

London, etc. and Paris, 13: Le Musée Carnavalet: The French Revolution, Chamber Music and Proust’s Bed

The Musée Carnavalet, located in the historic district of Marais on the Right Bank of the Seine, is housed in two former mansions that were built during the Renaissance (mid 1500s). The Carnavalet focuses on the history of Paris from pre-historic times to the present, and its collection includes “paintings, sculptures, furniture, decorative woodwork and objets d’art, shop signs, photographs, drawings, prints, posters, medals, coins, historical objects, archaeological collections and more… ” (Carnavalet brochure).

I found this museum fascinating because of the range of historical events it depicts, and the vast array of distinctive pieces. Given the opportunity, I would happily go back and look around for several hours more. The “objets” in the collection range from the strange and disturbing to the amusing – sometimes both at once; for example, a display relating the story of the man who introduced the idea of executing prisoners by cutting off their heads includes a set of guillotine earrings.

The years of the French Revolution provided much fodder for artists and writers, but the rapidly changing political climate meant that creative types, like politicians, fell in and out of favour depending on the week. In the case of those who had died, their remains were moved in and out of the Pantheon like pieces of fashion furniture, depending on how the political winds happened to be blowing.

In the ballroom of the Wendel Mansion at the Carnavalet, we had the good fortune of running into a quartet of talented young musicians who were putting on an informal concert. It was nice to sit down for a bit and listen to lovely music in such a distinguished setting before we proceeded to the next displays. Sort of like a sorbet between courses.

A highlight of the Musée de Carnavalet for me was the display of artifacts (or reproductions of artifacts) owned by Marcel Proust, whose 1.5 million-word novel I had just finished reading when we left for France (the culmination of a project on which I had been working for several years longer than it took Proust to write it).

Once Proust got down to the actual writing of his immense work of fiction, which didn’t happen until he was nearly 40, his preferred method of composition was to write in bed. So the fact that his bed is part of the display is no small matter to a Proust aficionado. Other interesting Proust articles included his cane and raincoat, and samples of the cork board he stuck against his walls to dull outside sound so he could concentrate.

After we had seen the Musée de Carnavalet we walked along the right bank of the Seine, and witnessed a fun encounter between a street musician and a passing clown (and the clown’s entourage). They weren’t very French, but it felt like a “French moment.”

Paris, like most major cities in the world these days, is home to many people whose accommodation is (at best) a tent.

London, etc. and Paris, 11: “I Love Paris… when It Drizzles.”

On Thursday morning, after settling in to our new, improved quarters and checking out the neighbourhood, we set out to discover Paris. (Arnie had been to France in the 1970s, but I had never been before.) It was still raining, but for the most part the rain was a fine drizzle so it didn’t interfere with our stroll.

After consuming a bowl of French onion soup at one of the many small cafés that edge the streets of Paris (because of course we did. Very tasty), we took the Métro to the south side of the Seine, emerging near the Quai D’Orsay, and began to walk west along the Left Bank/ Rive Gauche. First we passed the Assemblée Nationale, which is France’s lower House of Parliament, the upper being the Senate.

France, like most democracies, has three branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. The President (currently Emmanuel Macron), a position for which an election is held every five years, appoints the Prime Minister (normally the head of the party with the most seats); the Prime Minister and his or her deputies make up the Government. I understand that elected representatives whose politics are on the left sit on the left side of the PM in the Assemblée, and those whose politics are on the right sit on the right. Seems sensible.

(Please click on a photo for a better look. If you are reading this as an email, click “Read on Blog” (at the top of the email) to see larger versions of the photos.)

The French electoral system is somewhat confusing to an uneducated outsider (as are most countries’ electoral systems, come to think of it. Autocracies and dictatorships are easier to understand: rulers like Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela just retain control of everything, no matter what the voters decide they want). The French system of government is additionally confusing since France is a founding member of the European Union, so some of its legislative functions now fall under the purview of the European Commission.

We continued along the Left Bank until we reached the Pont Alexandre III. From Wikipedia, I learned that “[This] Beaux-Arts style bridge, with its exuberant Art Nouveau lamps, cherubs, nymphs and winged horses at both ends, was built between 1896 and 1900. It is named after Tsar Alexander III of Russia, who had concluded the Franco-Russian Alliance in 1892. His son Nicholas II laid the foundation stone in October 1896. The style of the bridge reflects that of the Grand Palais, to which it leads on the right bank.” (Well said, Wikipedia.)

The Grand Palais was closed for renovations when we were there, but would reopen temporarily for the Olympics in August. (The fencing and taekwondo events were held there.) The full site will reopen to the public in 2025. The Grand Palais is an exhibition hall, museum and historic site dedicated to French art, and it sounds as though it is quite spectacular. We’ll have to go back to investigate it (and Notre-Dame Cathedral, of course, which was still closed for restoration following the terrible fire in 2019).

We kept catching sight of the Eiffel Tower and since I couldn’t get over the fact that we were actually IN Paris looking at THE ACTUAL Eiffel Tower (of which I have owned a small replica since my sons visited the city in about 1992), I kept taking photos of it. As a result, I now have about 200 photos of the Eiffel Tower. I will not post them all.

After walking in front of the Grand Palais we took a right turn and headed up the Champs-Elysées to the Place de la Concorde, the largest square in Paris, where there was a lot of activity going on to prepare for the upcoming Olympics. The Place Concorde was the site of the BMX freestyle, breaking, skateboarding and 3X3 basketball events and as the photos illustrate, a lot of temporary seating was being created when we were there.

As we walked, I spent a lot of time just marvelling to myself that I was actually on the Rive Gauche, walking by the Quay D’Orsay, crossing the Seine, catching glimpses of the Eiffel Tower, standing in the Place de la Concorde. It was both magically surreal and exactly as I had expected it would be: a perfect combination. It also made me think that if you read enough books and see enough films set in a certain location (or point in history, I suppose), it is almost as good as visiting it.

Almost, but not quite.

_________________

Addendum

Did you know that “I Love Paris” was written by Cole Porter and published in 1953? It’s been “covered” by just about everyone – notably Bing Crosby, Andy Williams, Ella Fitzgerald, Doris Day, Dean Martin, Frank Sinatra and Screamin’ Jay Hawkins. It’s a short song, but long enough to become an ear worm.

London, etc. and Paris, 10: Paris Greets Us with Thunderbolts, Hail and a Bus Station from Hell

It costs about £30 (C$50) and takes approximately 8.5 hours to get from London to Paris on a bus. (This includes the cost of the ferry the bus drives onto in order to cross the English Channel). It costs about £125 (C$221.25) to travel from London to Paris through the “Chunnel” on a train. It costs about £80 (C$140) to fly from London to Paris.

Partly because of the cost, partly because we had no deadlines, and partly because I wanted to see the English Channel as we crossed it, we took the bus.

We had been warned that a rough crossing could be a nauseating experience or worse, but we were fortunate to make our trip to France on a wonderfully calm day. This was the second time we’d been to Dover, but we had much better views of its white cliffs this time, particularly after the ferry left the dock.

The actual crossing by ferry takes about 2.5 hours, and the trip was calm and picturesque. We arrived in Calais to find le temps there as pleasant as the weather had been in England. As we drove between Calais and Paris, I tried to get my brain around the fact that I was actually in France for the first time in my life. Since I was a young teenager, I’ve been studying French, reading books by French authors, watching French films, learning some French history, and envying absolutely everyone who got to be in France while I did not, so perhaps it is not difficult to understand why I found the experience almost unreal. As we travelled through the French countryside (where , by the way, I noticed happily – as I had in Germany a year or two before – that there are a lot of wind farms), I peered eagerly toward the horizon for my first sight of Paris.

But le temps had other ideas. The skies grew dark with clouds as the night fell, and as we reached Paris, a monstrous storm let loose. The torrent of hail and rain was intensified by near-constant flashes of lighting and crashing thunder. The bus, being largely a metal object, intensified the sound of the hailstones clattering down upon us, and I felt as though we were in a tin bucket – fortunately one with a lid on it, and windows.

I’m including a couple of the videos I took after the bus had pulled over to the side of the road, to wait for the worst to pass.

All hail breaks loose.

All of this meteorological excitement meant that we arrived at Paris’s Bercy Seine bus station a couple of hours later than scheduled, after ten at night. Delayed buses and storms be damned, all the service staff were heading home on time. Loiterers were being shooed out of the waiting room and asked to stand on the platforms until their connecting buses arrived. The lights in the office areas were extinguished, and doors and windows that might provide access to any useful information were securely locked.

At first sight, the streets of Paris were not how I’d imagined them

Not being entirely fluent in French (not bad, but not fluent), we had some serious difficulty trying to figure out where to leave the building in order to find a ride to our hotel. We asked other travellers on the platform where the exit was, but those who did understand our questions and gesticulations all seemed to be waiting for connecting buses and didn’t know any more than we did about the layout of the station.

Several days later, when I finally had some time to try to figure out where we had gone wrong with la Gare Bercy Seine, I discovered that our challenges were not entirely due to our inadequacies in French (although our fellow-sufferer was also from Toronto, so maybe it’s a Canadian thing to expect that there be signage). On Trip Advisor I came across a review by “Oyster Boys” entitled “Flixbus Station at Bercy Seine in Paris is the Bermuda Triangle!!!!” Turns out its authors had had the same experience as we did, only in reverse: they’d been trying to leave Paris to go to Brussels when they’d encountered the mysteries of the Gare from Hell. “Finding the Flixbus station is like looking for the North Korean nuclear missile site,” they wrote. “You can’t find it. It’s almost as if they don’t want you to find it. It’s hidden underground inside a park….yes a park full of trees and some kind of playground full of graffitis…. It’s like walking into the abyss of the underworld. There’s no sign that says it’s a bus station. You just have to walk to a park with no sign to lead you to the entrance. I could see people circling around the park looking for the station.”

The only exit we could find opened into the aforementioned park. As we peered through the ongoing downpour we noticed that past the park, a couple of city blocks away, there was a street with cars on it. Although the worst of the storm had passed, we knew we were about to get very wet, but we had little choice. So off we went toward the street where we could call an Uber, dragging our suitcases through the park’s puddles as we walked.

After being tricked once by a non-Uber driver who convinced us he was an Uber driver, and then shouting at him until he returned us to the original meeting spot and let us out of his vehicle, and after finally connecting with our actual Uber driver (yes. I know. Check the license plate. We won’t forget again), we were dropped off after midnight at our small hotel – on one of those wonderful Paris streets I’d come so far to see. It was no longer raining, and the reflections of the street lights glinted on the wet stones and pavement.

However, the day was not quite over. We had to wake someone up inside the hotel in order to be let in and register. Our third-floor room, it turned out, was only a few feet larger than the double bed, but we were exhausted: we’d figure out how to manage the unpacking of the suitcases in the morning. I plugged my power bar into the wall so I could recharge my phone and my watch, and promptly plunged the entire hotel into darkness.

After Arnie went down to confess my sin, and received a small lecture from the night manager, we heard a caretaker (or most likely the manager himself) open a door just outside our room, and fiddle around with things a bit. Suddenly the lights came on. We turned them out and went to sleep.

The next morning we got up and looked around, now even more fully aware of how much time we might need to spend just to figure out how to sort our stuff so that we could get at it when we needed it, and still have enough floor space to get from the bed to the bathroom and to the doorway to the hall. But after a superb petit déjeuner in the downstairs breakfast room (it included fruit, eggs, sausages, bacon, croissants, real coffee, pain chocolat and more, and was included in the price of our room), we went to the desk to ask about something else, and the person who was then on duty said, “Hey. You guys are here for an extended stay. Wouldn’t you like a larger room?”

The next thing we knew we were in a main-floor “suite,” at no additional cost (a very small suite, but it had a very large bathroom and a hallway and a window to the patio outside and lots of room for suitcases).

And so, as it turned out, May 1 was the only truly difficult day on our entire trip. We had other moments of frustration (getting lost in the subway system, for example, which happened several times in Paris, as it had in London), but despite their reputation, every Parisian we encountered was helpful and friendly (aside from one or two who worked in booths at the Métro, see above), and no day that followed was anything like the day we went from London, England to Paris, France.

And even that one day had caused us only a few hours of grief. After that, we were in Perfect Paris, which was all that I had ever dreamed it would be, and more.

Turning the Clocks Forward While Reading Marcel Proust

As I move closer to fulfilling my years-long resolution to finish reading the entire 1.3-million-word novel In Search of Lost Time (ISOLT) by Marcel Proust, I considered it a lovely coincidence that a couple of weeks ago, I came across an extended passage in the book that intersected with my own life at that very moment – and not in just one way, but in two.

Volume I, published in 1996, which I purchased many years ago.

For about fifteen years, I have been perusing the seven parts (contained in six volumes) that make up Proust’s monumental opus, at the rate of one thick tome every three or four years. Clearly I was not so gripped by his writing that I felt compelled to read the entire novel in one sitting, but neither was I ever reluctant to pick it up again. Last month, I decided that the weeks in advance of my first-ever trip to France – which will be occurring around the start of May – were the perfect time to start reading the one volume I still hadn’t read.

In Search of Lost Time proceeds at an extremely leisurely pace and, fortunately for people like me, the final volume comes with a synopsis of the volumes that came before, along with an index to real and fictional characters and places appearing in the book. Since I started ISOLT, I’ve come to think of reading it as a way of life, rather than an event: it is always there waiting for me when I want it. It has occurred to me that finishing it might not augur well for my own longevity – what reason will I have to go on? – but then I remembered that I can always start the book again. It is, after all, a story that was prompted by the main character’s recollection of his childhood, a recollection that was in turn prompted by the taste of a madeleine. Not to get too meta, but who is to say that some event or scent or view may not, at some point in the future, prompt me to start the entire book from the beginning?

I have been enchanted enough by In Search of Lost Time that the many sights I want to see when we go to France this year include several locations that have become familiar to me thanks to Proust. He gave a number of his locations fictional names but his book is so widely known and respected that one town, Illiers, even renamed itself  “Illiers Combray” in recognition of its role as model for the fictional town of Combray, where Proust’s protagonist (M.) grew up. Other locations that provided settings for various events in Proust’s novel are easy enough to find: Balbec, the seaside resort in Normandy, where much of Volume II (which I read under the title Within a Budding Grove; titles of the different volumes change depending on the translator) is set is actually Cabourg.

In Paris, the setting for much of ISOLT, there will be many things to see that are non-Proust-related. But I’ll be getting in touch with him there as well. (I have been told that that I must see the Carnavalet Museum in that city where Proust’s bedroom has been recreated, including the bed in which he wrote much of the novel.) All in all, reading the concluding volume of the book before I went to France became imperative.

So imagine my pleasure to come upon a passage in Volume VI which seemed almost presciently relevant to my life. To start with, I was reading it in the days immediately prior to March 9, when we turned the clocks forward for daylight saving time this year. In those few days, Facebook was alive with opinions about the impending devastation the upcoming time change would wreak on mental and physical health and/or the joys of longer evenings (opinions varied depending on the constitution, the age, and the employment status of the person posting). But secondly, due to our forthcoming trip, as I read I was thinking about Paris more personally than usual – for example, wondering how far the Hotel de Paris Invalides, where we will stay for part of our visit, might be from certain locations Proust mentions.

Then I came upon this:

I had gone on walking as I turned over in my mind this recent meeting with St. Loup and had come a long way out of my way; I was almost at the Pont des Invalides. The lamps (there were very few of them, on account of the Gothas[1]) had already been lit, a little too early because “the clocks had been put forward” a little too early, when the night still came rather quickly, the time having been “changed” once and for all for the whole of the summer just as a central heating system is turned on or off once or for all on a fixed date; and above the city with its nocturnal illumination, in one whole quarter of the sky – the sky that knew nothing of summer time and winter time and did not deign to recognize that half past eight had become half past nine —in one whole quarter of the sky from which the blue had not vanished, there was still a little daylight. Over that whole portion of the city which is dominated by the towers of the Trocadéro, the sky looked like a vast sea the colour of turquoise, from which gradually there emerged, as it ebbed, a whole line of little black rocks, which might even have been nothing more than a row of fishermen’s nets and which were in fact small clouds – a sea at that moment the colour of turquoise, sweeping along with it, without their noticing, the whole human race in the wake of the vast revolution of the earth, that earth upon which they are mad enough to continue their own revolutions, their futile wars, like the war which at this very moment was staining France crimson with blood. But if one looked for long at the sky, this lazy, too beautiful sky which did not condescend to change its timetable and above the city, where the lamps had been lit, indolently prolonged its lingering day in these bluish tones, one was seized with giddiness: it was no longer a flat expanse of sea but a vertically stepped series of blue glaciers. And the towers of the Trocadéro which seemed so near to the turquoise steps must, one realized, be infinitely remote from them, like the twin towers of certain towns in Switzerland which at a distance one would suppose to be near neighbours of the upper mountain slopes.

Time Regained, In Search of Lost Time Volume VI by Marcel Proust (Mayor, Kilmartin and Enright translation, 1981, 1992)
Volume VI, now underway

In Proust’s world, almost everything is a reminder of something else, and the evening sight described in this passage takes his mind back to a scene one hundred years before (which, of course, he could only imagine, as it happened before his birth), when in 1815 Bonaparte (hoping to build public support for his Charter) filled the Champs de Mars – the very boulevard down which Proust was by now walking, having left behind the Pont des Invalides – with an exotic parade of soldiers in dress uniforms from across Europe.

I have plotted out the Pont des Invalides on a map (a 20-minute walk from our hotel in Paris) and you can be sure that I will be standing “almost at” it and looking toward the Trocadéro one evening during our stay. And I have located the Champs de Mars nearby. Depending on our time and available modes of transportation, this may be the closest I will get to sharing the literal vision of the work that has created so many imagined pictures in my head over these past years. I will report to you on how that goes in a forthcoming series of travel blog posts.

With its lingering passages of description, philosophical ramblings, gossip, snapshots of France at the end of the 19th century, political discourse, conjectures about homosexuality, and artistic musings, Proust’s long novel is more like a stroll in the park with a voluble friend than any kind of tension- or action-driven novel most of us might choose to read to divert our attention today. It is strong on descriptions of everything – people and places in particular become etched in the mind, increasingly familiar as Proust’s world unfolds volume by volume, but his language is beautifully repetitive too, as fully-leaved trees might seem to be when you are driving down a country road. Just as you will note repetitions in phrasing between one sentence and the next in the passage I’ve included above, the events move, for the most part, at such a languid pace that one can lose one’s page location and spend an extensive period of time reading very similar passages until you locate the one you were actually reading last. Proust on an e-reader would be a nightmare, particularly if the bookmark function didn’t work.

That said, if you think that reading Proust’s novel would be too difficult for you, think again. It is very accessible, and very lovely. Granted, it is very long, but “long” does not mean insurmountable (i.e., does not equal “high,” as in the context of Everest, but continues on a stroll-able path at mostly the same altitude). You can read one volume or half of one and leave it at that, or you can read a volume every couple of years as I did. And you can borrow the first one from the library before adding the entire novel to your book collection: something you will definitely want to do, however, if you finish the whole thing. (Bragging rights are important for both Everest and Proust.) Proust is a pleasure that should intimidate no reader.

(Note: Today I learned that Proust’s full name was Marcel Valentin Louis Eugène Georges Proust. No wonder he felt comfortable with using so many words to tell his story.)

✻✻✻✻

I have been pleased with the response to my previous travel blogs (including ones to India, Cuba, Italy and Germany) and hope readers will find material of interest to them this time too, as Arnie and I explore England for ten days and then cross the channel into France. I have never been to France, but have been eager to visit the country since I started learning French – about sixty years ago (??? How did that happen???). I’ve been brushing up on my French with Duolingo and am amazed at how much I remember. Whether I’ll actually be able to speak the language when I reach the country of its origin remains to be seen. When I was in Italy I could remember no Italian, only French.

If you are interested in following along, please sign up (no charge) to get a notice each time I post a new instalment. We depart on April 21, and return on May 11. I’m looking forward to sharing our experiences with my readers.

P.S. I am cross-posting this and the upcoming travel articles on I Am All Write on WordPress and I Am All Write Too on Substack. This is the first step of a process on which I intend to embark upon as soon as I have finished writing my current novel, in which I will discontinue writing fiction for the most part and focus on my blogs – offering free posts at WordPress but monetizing those at Substack.


[1] German bombers, which mainly flew at night.  Volume VI, “Time Regained,” takes place during World War I.